Perinatal Outcome in Meconium Stained Amniotic Fluidat Dhiraj General Hospital, a Tertiary Health Care Centre in Rural Gujarat: A Prospective Study

Article Information

Jitendra Shukla1, Unnati Amin2, Piyusha Chandrayan1*, Saini HB3

1Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth University, Gujarat, India

2Senior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth University, Gujarat, India

3Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth University, Gujarat, India

*Corresponding Author: Piyusha Chandrayan, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dhiraj Hospital, S.B.K.S. M.I & R.C., Sumandeep Vidyapeeth University, Pipariya, Vadodara, Gujarat, India, Tel: 8758747564

Received: 19 June 2021; Accepted: 28 June 2021; Published: 17 July 2021

Citation:

Jitendra Shukla, Unnati Amin, Piyusha Chandrayan, Saini HB. Perinatal Outcome in Meconium Stained Amniotic Fluidat Dhiraj General Hospital, a Tertiary Health Care Centre in Rural Gujarat: A Prospective Study. Obstetrics and Gynecology Research 4 (2021): 159-165.

Share at Facebook

Abstract

Introduction: Meconium in amniotic fluid is a serious sign of fetal compromise and associated with a perinatal complications and outcome, including low APGAR scores, increased incidence of chorioamnionitis, increased incidence of neonatal intensive care admission and high rate of perinatal death. It is less likely for a fetus to pass meconium before 34 weeks of gestation. After 37 weeks its incidence increases steadily with increasing gestational age. It reflects maturation of fetal myelination and parasympathetic innervations. Aspiration can occur in utero with fetal gasping or with the first breath of life after birth. However most of the infants with meconium in liquor do not have low APGAR score, acidosis or clinical illness compared to the infants born with clear amniotic fluid.

Material and method: A prospective observational study was conducted in obstetrics and gynaecology department of Dhiraj Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth from March 2019 to August 2020.

Methodology: After history and clinical examination,all patients were allowed to go in labour and were watched throughout labour. 
• Patients who had meconium stained liquor on spontaneous or artificial rupture of membrane were taken as cases. 
• Other patients who did not have meconium stained liquor throughout labour were taken as controls. 
• Time of meconium passage, consistency of meconium was noted in each case. 
• Thin meconium and thick meconium cases were seperately identified. 
• Fetal heart rate patterns were monitored throughout labour. 
• Type of delivery whether spontaneous, oper-ative vaginal or LSCS was noted in each case. 
• APGAR scoring at 1 and 5 minutes, need for resuscitation, stomach wash and endotracheal intubation in baby was noted. 
• Need for NICU admission for complications

Keywords

Meconium Aspiration Syndrome, Fetal Heart Rate, LSCS, Oropharyngeal Suction, NICU Admission

Meconium Aspiration Syndrome articles Meconium Aspiration Syndrome Research articles Meconium Aspiration Syndrome review articles Meconium Aspiration Syndrome PubMed articles Meconium Aspiration Syndrome PubMed Central articles Meconium Aspiration Syndrome 2023 articles Meconium Aspiration Syndrome 2024 articles Meconium Aspiration Syndrome Scopus articles Meconium Aspiration Syndrome impact factor journals Meconium Aspiration Syndrome Scopus journals Meconium Aspiration Syndrome PubMed journals Meconium Aspiration Syndrome medical journals Meconium Aspiration Syndrome free journals Meconium Aspiration Syndrome best journals Meconium Aspiration Syndrome top journals Meconium Aspiration Syndrome free medical journals Meconium Aspiration Syndrome famous journals Meconium Aspiration Syndrome Google Scholar indexed journals Fetal Heart Rate articles Fetal Heart Rate Research articles Fetal Heart Rate review articles Fetal Heart Rate PubMed articles Fetal Heart Rate PubMed Central articles Fetal Heart Rate 2023 articles Fetal Heart Rate 2024 articles Fetal Heart Rate Scopus articles Fetal Heart Rate impact factor journals Fetal Heart Rate Scopus journals Fetal Heart Rate PubMed journals Fetal Heart Rate medical journals Fetal Heart Rate free journals Fetal Heart Rate best journals Fetal Heart Rate top journals Fetal Heart Rate free medical journals Fetal Heart Rate famous journals Fetal Heart Rate Google Scholar indexed journals LSCS articles LSCS Research articles LSCS review articles LSCS PubMed articles LSCS PubMed Central articles LSCS 2023 articles LSCS 2024 articles LSCS Scopus articles LSCS impact factor journals LSCS Scopus journals LSCS PubMed journals LSCS medical journals LSCS free journals LSCS best journals LSCS top journals LSCS free medical journals LSCS famous journals LSCS Google Scholar indexed journals Oropharyngeal Suction articles Oropharyngeal Suction Research articles Oropharyngeal Suction review articles Oropharyngeal Suction PubMed articles Oropharyngeal Suction PubMed Central articles Oropharyngeal Suction 2023 articles Oropharyngeal Suction 2024 articles Oropharyngeal Suction Scopus articles Oropharyngeal Suction impact factor journals Oropharyngeal Suction Scopus journals Oropharyngeal Suction PubMed journals Oropharyngeal Suction medical journals Oropharyngeal Suction free journals Oropharyngeal Suction best journals Oropharyngeal Suction top journals Oropharyngeal Suction free medical journals Oropharyngeal Suction famous journals Oropharyngeal Suction Google Scholar indexed journals NICU Admission articles NICU Admission Research articles NICU Admission review articles NICU Admission PubMed articles NICU Admission PubMed Central articles NICU Admission 2023 articles NICU Admission 2024 articles NICU Admission Scopus articles NICU Admission impact factor journals NICU Admission Scopus journals NICU Admission PubMed journals NICU Admission medical journals NICU Admission free journals NICU Admission best journals NICU Admission top journals NICU Admission free medical journals NICU Admission famous journals NICU Admission Google Scholar indexed journals fetus articles fetus Research articles fetus review articles fetus PubMed articles fetus PubMed Central articles fetus 2023 articles fetus 2024 articles fetus Scopus articles fetus impact factor journals fetus Scopus journals fetus PubMed journals fetus medical journals fetus free journals fetus best journals fetus top journals fetus free medical journals fetus famous journals fetus Google Scholar indexed journals mother’s womb articles mother’s womb Research articles mother’s womb review articles mother’s womb PubMed articles mother’s womb PubMed Central articles mother’s womb 2023 articles mother’s womb 2024 articles mother’s womb Scopus articles mother’s womb impact factor journals mother’s womb Scopus journals mother’s womb PubMed journals mother’s womb medical journals mother’s womb free journals mother’s womb best journals mother’s womb top journals mother’s womb free medical journals mother’s womb famous journals mother’s womb Google Scholar indexed journals uterus articles uterus Research articles uterus review articles uterus PubMed articles uterus PubMed Central articles uterus 2023 articles uterus 2024 articles uterus Scopus articles uterus impact factor journals uterus Scopus journals uterus PubMed journals uterus medical journals uterus free journals uterus best journals uterus top journals uterus free medical journals uterus famous journals uterus Google Scholar indexed journals gestation articles gestation Research articles gestation review articles gestation PubMed articles gestation PubMed Central articles gestation 2023 articles gestation 2024 articles gestation Scopus articles gestation impact factor journals gestation Scopus journals gestation PubMed journals gestation medical journals gestation free journals gestation best journals gestation top journals gestation free medical journals gestation famous journals gestation Google Scholar indexed journals fetal gasping articles fetal gasping Research articles fetal gasping review articles fetal gasping PubMed articles fetal gasping PubMed Central articles fetal gasping 2023 articles fetal gasping 2024 articles fetal gasping Scopus articles fetal gasping impact factor journals fetal gasping Scopus journals fetal gasping PubMed journals fetal gasping medical journals fetal gasping free journals fetal gasping best journals fetal gasping top journals fetal gasping free medical journals fetal gasping famous journals fetal gasping Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

1. Introduction

The word meconium originates from Greek word “meconium arion” which basically means like opium or poppy like substances which cause sleep like state of the fetus in mother’s womb [1]. The baby in the uterus is surrounded by the amniotic fluid providing a protective and low resistance environment which acts as a cushion for the baby. It is foetal urine which is contributed by secretions from amniotic membranes and foetal skin [2]. Meconium in amniotic fluid is a serious sign of fetal compromise and associated with a perinatal complications and outcome including low APGAR scores, increased incidence of chorioamnionitis, increased incidence of neonatal intensive care admission and high rate of perinatal death. It is less likely for a fetus to pass meconium before 34 weeks of gestation. After 37 weeks its incidence increases steadily with  increasing  gestational age. It reflects maturation of fetal myelination and parasympathetic innervations. Aspiration can occur in utero with fetal gasping or with the first breath of life after birth. However, most of the infants with meconium in liquor do not have low APGAR score, acidosis or clinical illness compared to the infants born with clear amniotic fluid. Thus the neonatal outcome in meconium stained liquor is generally comparable to deliveries with clear amniotic fluid, when the fetal heart  rate is normal. Perinatal morbidity is increased in  newborn  with  abnormal heart rate [3]. Meconium stained amniotic fluid is associated with lots of adverse outcome of fetus and has long been considered to be a hint for poor perinatal outcome. This observational study was undertaken  to find out the perinatal outcome in amniotic stained liquor compared to clear liquor.

2. Materials and Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted in obstetrics and gynaecology department of Dhiraj Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth from March 2019 to August 2020. The inclusion criteria were women in labor with

  1. 1 Term pregnancy (>37 weeks gestation)
  2. 2 Cephalic presentation
  3. 3 Live singleton pregnancy Exclusion criteria were:
  4. Cephalopelvic disproportion
  5. Presentations other than cephalic

‘Pregnant women in labour with not knowing last menstrual date’ Maternal complications like Eclampsia, Antepartum hemorrhage

  1. Intrauterine fetal death
  2. Congenital malformation
  3. Pre-existing maternal heart or lung disease
  4. Pregnancies with IUGR babies

All patients fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria as mentioned above were taken for the study.

  1. After history and clinical examination,all patients were allowed to go in labour and were watched throughout
  2. Patients who had meconium stained liquor on spontaneous or artificial rupture of membrane were taken as cases.
  3. Other patients who did not have meconium stained liquor throughout labour were taken as
  4. Time of meconium passage, consistency of meconium was noted in each case.
  5. Thin meconium and thick meconium cases were seperately identified.
  6. Fetal heart rate patterns were monitored throughout
  7. Type of delivery whether spontaneous, operative vaginal or LSCS was noted in each case.
  8. APGAR scoring at 1 and 5 minutes, need for resuscitation, stomach wash and endotracheal intubation in baby was
  9. Need for NICU admission for complications like respiratory distress syndrome, aspiration pneumonia, birth asphyxia, septicemia, jaundice, convulsion, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy was noted.
  10. Duration of hospital stay of neonate was

2.1 Statistical methods

As this was a prevalence study, purposive sampling was done. All the categorial variables were analysed with the help of chi square test and fisher’s exact test and all the continuous variables were analysed with independent ‘t test’.

3. Result

The data collected in this study of 500 patients is presented in the following tables. Out of 500 patients selected for the present study which had inclusion criteria, 15 % were meconium stained out of which 56 cases had thin meconium and 22 cases had thick meconium. Fetal CTG abnormalities were more common in MSAF group and were noted in 29.4% of cases which is significantly increased compared to control group with CTG abnormalities in 7.1%. The difference was significant with p value of <0.001.When the subgroups of thick and thin meconium were compared, the thick meconium group showed more frequent fetal heart rate changes. Variable deceleration was the most common CTG abnormality noted. 37 (42.3%) patients with meconium stained amniotic fluid had normal vaginal delivery, while in control group out of 422, 353 (83.6%) delivered normally. Incidence of LSCS and assisted vaginal delivery was more in meconium stained amniotic fluid. On comparing the subgroups of thick and thin meconium, it was the thick group where operative intervention was more commonly needed.

The difference between subgroups is insignificant with p value of 0.125. Relatively higher p value is due to low number of cases in thick subgroup. If meconium first appeared in the latent phase, the incidence of LSCS was more as compared to when it appeared in the second stage. The overall incidence of LSCS was higher if the mechanism was thick. Moreover the LSCS incidence was much higher if the meconium was thick irrespective of stage. Low Apgar Score at 1 and 5 minutes was more prevalent in MSAF compared to control with p value of <0.001. At 1 minute the low APGAR score was noted in 39.7% of MSAF cases. At 5 minutes, the low APGAR score cases reduced to 24.3%, but was much higher than controls with strong statistical significance.

Low Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes is noted in MSAF and is more often noted in cases with thick meconium. Low APGAR score was noted in 54.5% and 45.4% at 1 and 5 minutes respectively in cases with thick meconium compared to cases with thin meconium with low APGAR score in 33.9% and 16% at 1 and 5 minutes respectively which is statistically significant (p value of 0.043). Oropharangeal suction was done in 47 babies (60.2%) in cases against 61 babies (14.4%) in control group with a p value <0.001. Oropharangeal suction was done in all the babies with thick meconium. Among the thin meconium cases and controls, Oropharangeal suction was done only in those babies who were relatively depressed.

NICU admission was frequent in cases and was needed in 24.5% of  cases compared to 5.7% of controls. The difference is highly significant with p value of <0.001. On comparing the thin and thick subgroups, it was the thick subgroup with high incidence of NICU admission. Nearly half of the cases with thick meconium needed NICU admission and only 14.2% of cases with thin meconium needed NICU admission. Perinatal complications were seen in 13 cases out of which 3 developed MAS, 8 developed HIE, 2 babies developed sepsis.

MSAF (Cases)

NMSAF (Controls)

Total

78 (15.6%)

422 (84.4%)

500

Thin

Thick

56 (71.7%)

22 (28.2%)

Table 1: Incidence of MSAF.

FHR Abnormality

Status

Total

P Value

Cases Controls

 (n=500)

 0.0001

(n=78)

(n=422)

Present (%)

23 (29.4%)

30 (7.1%)

53 (10.65%)

Table 2: FHR Abnormality in Different Groups.

FHS Abnormality

Cases (MSAF)

Total

P Value

Thin

Thick

(n= 78)

Present(%)

10

13

23

0.532

(17.8%)

(59%)

(29.4%)

Absent(%)

46

9

55

0.0001

(82.1%)

(40.9%)

(70.5%)

Table 3: FHS Abnormality in Cases.

Mode of Delivery

Status

Total

P Value

Cases Controls

(n=500 )

(n=78 )

(n= 422 )

Normal Vaginal

37

353

390

0.0001

(47.4%)

(83.6%)

(78%)

Assisted Vaginal

11

22

33

0.056

(14.1%)

(5.2%)

(6.6%)

LSCS

30

47

77

0.053

(38.4%)

(11.1%)

(15.4%)

Table 4: Mode of Delivery.

Mode of Delivery

Cases

(N=78)

Total

P Value

Thin (n= 56 )

Thick (n= 22 )

(n= 78 )

Normal Vaginal

33

4

37

0.0001

(58.9%)

(18.1%)

(47.4%)

Assisted Vaginal

5

6

11

0.763

(8.9%)

(27.2%)

(14.1%)

LSCS

18

12

30

0.273

(32.1%)

(54.5%)

(38.4%)

Table 5: Mode of Delivery in Msaf Cases.

Labour Stage At

Meconium Detection

Type of  Meconium

No. of Cases

Mode of Delivery

Vaginal LSCS Delivery

Asst. Vaginal

Latent Phase

Thin

22

13

1

8

Thick

10

1

2

7

Active Phase

Thin

21

11

2

8

Thick

8

2

2

4

Second Stage

Thin

13

9

2

2

Thick

4

1

2

1

Table 6: Meconium First Observed and Mode of Delivery.

Apgar Score At 1 Minute

Status

Total

P Value

Case Controls

(n= 500)

0.0001

(n= 78 )

(n= 422 )

 

<5

31(39.7%)

36(8.5%)

67(13.4%)

>5

47 (60.2%)

386 (91.4%)

433(86.6%)

Apgar Score At 5 Minute

Status

Total

P Value

Cases Controls

(n=500)

0.0001

(n= 78)

(n= 422)

<7

19 (24.3%)

18(4.2%)

37(7.4%)

>7

59(75.6%)

404(95.7%)

463(92.6%)

Table 7: Apgar Score at 1 and 5 Minutes.

Apgar Score At 1 Minute

Cases

Total

P Value

Thin (n=56 )  

Thick (n= 22 )

(n=78)

<5

19 (33.9%)

12(54.5%)

31(39.7%)

0.124

>5

37(66%)

10(45.4%)

47(60.2%)

 

Apgar Score At 5 Minute

Cases

Total

P Value

Thin (n= 56 )

Thick (n= 22 )

(n=78)

<7

9 (16%)

10(45.4%)

19(24.3%)

0.0166

>7

47(83.9%)

12(54.5%)

59(75.6%)

 

Table 8: Apgar Score at 1 and 5 Minutes in Msaf.

Oropharyngeal Suction

Status

Total

P Value

Cases Controls

(n=500)

(n= 78)

(n= 422)

Reqired

47 (60.2)

61(14.4%)

108(21.6%)

0.0001

Not Required

31(39.7%)

361(85.5%)

392(78.4%)

 

Table 9: Requirement of Oropharyngeal Suction.

Nicu Admission

Status

Total

P Value

Cases Controls

(n= 500 )

(n= 78)

(n= 422)

Needed

18

20

38

0.746

(23%)

(4.7%)

(7.6%)

Not Needed

60

402

462

0.0001

(76.9%)

(95.2%)

(92.4%)

Table 10: Incidence of Nicu Admission.

Nicu Admission

Type of Meconium

Total

P Value

Thin (n=56 )

Thick (n= 22 )

(n= 78 )

Needed

8

10

18

 

(14.2%)

(45.4%)

(23%)

 

Not Needed

48

12

60

 

(85.7%)

(54.4%)

(76.9%)

 

Table 11: Nicu Admission in Cases.

4. Conclusion

Thus to conclude Thick MSL is associated with abnormal CTG changes, higher incidence of LSCS, low apgar score and more NICU admissions due to Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS), Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE), and sepsis as compared to thin MSL.

Acknowledgement

The study is conducted after taking informed and written consent from the patients.

The study is self funded. No extra expense was required for the study.

The study was conducted after taking ethical approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest for this study.

References

  1. Vaghela HP, Deliwala K, Shah P. Fetal outcome in deliveries with meconium stained liquor. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 3 (2014): 909-912.
  2. Singh G, Singh O, Thapar K. Neonatal outcome in meconium stained amniotic fluid: a hospital based study. Int J Contemp Pediatr 4 (2017): 356-360.
  3. Qadir S, Jan S, Chachoo JA, et al. Perinatal and neonatal outcome in meconium stained amniotic fluid. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 5 (2016): 1400-1405.

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved